Rangers ‘remain unsatisfied’ after SFA referee talks

⚽ Rangers ‘Remain Unsatisfied’ After SFA Referee Talks

Rangers Football Club has released a strongly-worded statement confirming they “remain unsatisfied” following talks with the Scottish FA (SFA) regarding the officiating in their recent Premier Sports Cup semi-final defeat to rivals Celtic. The meeting, which saw club representatives seek explanations for key decisions, appears to have done little to quell the mounting frustration at Ibrox over what they view as persistent refereeing inconsistencies in high-profile Scottish matches.

The core of Rangers’ grievance stems from a specific incident in the high-stakes Old Firm semi-final, which ended in a 3-1 extra-time defeat. The controversy centres on the challenge by Celtic defender Auston Trusty on Rangers goalkeeper Jack Butland just before half-time. Despite Butland having secured the ball, Trusty’s boot made forceful contact with the goalkeeper’s head. On-field referee Nick Walsh issued only a yellow card, a decision that was upheld after a subsequent VAR check.

Rangers believe the severity of the contact warranted a red card and that the failure of both the referee and the Video Assistant Referee to reach that conclusion was a major error that influenced the outcome of the match. The club’s official statement, released after the meeting with SFA head of referees Willie Collum, clearly outlined their displeasure.

> “Following that meeting, we remain unsatisfied with the explanation of the referee’s decision in that incident, the application of the Laws of the Game, and the VAR review itself, which we do not believe was sufficiently robust or thorough.”

>

Deeper Concerns Over Consistency

While the Butland incident was the catalyst for the talks, the club’s statement makes it clear their concerns are far broader than a single match. They have raised “legitimate concerns about the consistency of refereeing in Scottish football” and stressed that “too many important matches continue to be influenced by calls that are inconsistent and difficult to justify.”

Rangers highlighted the real-world impact of these decisions, noting that they “determine results, impact fans, and affect the livelihoods of players, coaches and staff.” This points towards a systemic concern within the club that the current standards of officiating are failing to support the professional integrity of the Scottish game.

The Ibrox hierarchy also noted that they have “consistently raised issues” with the SFA over time, yet feel there has not been “enough change in how refereeing is being developed at the highest level.” This suggests a fundamental lack of confidence in the SFA’s process for developing, training, and overseeing its match officials.

A Demand for Lasting Improvement

The statement concludes with an unambiguous pledge to continue challenging the governing body. “For the benefit of our supporters and the wider game in the country, we will continue to hold the Scottish FA to account and expect them to lead meaningful progress that delivers lasting improvement.”

This public challenge places significant pressure on the SFA to not only offer more comprehensive explanations but also demonstrate concrete steps towards improving the consistency and quality of officiating, particularly concerning the use and implementation of VAR technology. The debate over refereeing standards in Scotland continues, with Rangers’ latest intervention ensuring it remains firmly in the spotlight.

Would you like to read the full, original statement released by Rangers F

ootball Club?