BAD NEWS: Cowboys head coach Michael John McCarthy just pass away now due to…

As the NFL Draft draws near, the franchise has been conspicuously quiet after declaring early in the offseason that they were “all in” for 2024. There is confusion in Cowboys Nation as a result of the possibility of trading quarterback

sending Gardner Minshew and four choices to Dallas in exchange for Dak Prescott’s contract, which is about to expire.

 

amid all the chatter about what the Cowboys have NOT done thus far.

Prescott has no contract that runs past this season when he reaches 2024. Fans of Dak worry about what that means for his future in Dallas. However, schlock jock and NFL expert Craig Carton talked about an unsubstantiated rumour that Prescott was traded to the Las Vegas Raiders.

There are rumours on Dallas sports talk radio that Dak Prescott is set to be dealt, so there’s smoke in the air from that direction. The plot, which is unsubstantiated, goes like this: there have been rumours that the Dallas Cowboys and the Las Vegas Raiders have discussed sending Gardner Minshew and four choices to Dallas in exchange for Dak Prescott’s contract, which is about to expire.

Does this have any merit? Carton is mistaken, as usual. In a fantasy trade article, USA Today made some wild guesses about what Dallas would get. And that’s it. (We discuss the idea in “What Could Dallas Actually Get for Dak?”.) This isn’t a “Dallas

Apart from the conjecture, which stems from Dallas’ passivity and hesitation, that perhaps Dallas would be better off dealing Dak than losing him as a free agency in 2025, there is no “smoke in the air.”

Prescott’s trade value won’t likely increase from where it is at this point if the Cowboys—who clearly have doubts about Prescott’s long-term suit in Dallas—are at all uneasy about it. Would a team vying for Prescott’s talents be prepared to pay a premium for his services? We’ll notify Cowboys Nation if the Cowboys ever truly attempt to look into that.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*